Testimony before the Senate Business and Commerce Committee

Bill Peacock, Vice President of Research & Director, Center for Economic Freedom

INTRODUCTION

(August 24, 2010) Hearing by the Texas Senate Business and Commerce Committee helped shine some light on the challenges of Texas’ green energy efforts.

We heard great things about the state’s energy efficiency program. However, there was very little focus on the costs to consumers. Since 2002, Texas consumers have paid $591.1 million to support the state’s energy efficiency program, and the program’s estimated cost for 2010 is $114.8 million. A recent increase to the program by the Public Utility Commission of Texas will probably double these costs. And legislative proposals could increase the annual cost to over $500 million. All of this would be okay, of course, if the state’s energy efficiency program saved consumers money through reduced consumption of electricity. However, there is simply no way to properly determine the efficiency of the state’s energy efficiency program. But an educated guess is that it costs more than it saves.

This same flaw also plagues the state’s subsidies of renewable energy through the renewable portfolio standard, CREZ lines, and tax breaks. Several people testifying today were asking the legislature to give them subsidies for technologies like solar, biomass, and geothermal. But Sen. Chris Harris captured the problem with these subsidies when he asked, “How can I justify going to my constituents and tell them that I voted to give you money?” Sen. Mike Jackson also pointed out that solar projects are much like wind projects in that we give them credits for economic development but after the installation there are very few jobs left. Renewable energy generation simply costs more than generation from conventional sources.

Full Testimony PDF Document

If Texas wants to reduce energy costs and save money for Texas consumers, it needs to go back to the drawing board and make significant changes to the energy efficiency program and eliminate the Renewable Portfolio Standard.

We invite all of you to get a discussion going.  Please submit your comments at the end of this article, Thanks.